Biden’s White House journalists are talking about whether they felt thinking that the president was mentally appropriate for the position and if West Wing employees tried to hide the truth in the North -Americans.
The “original original sin of CNN’s axios journalist Axios, Alex Thompson: The decline of President Biden, his coverage and disastrous choice to run again” was published on Tuesday and has created a large number of talks among the white -home press bodies while the problem was put on the avant -garde.
The book details the concerns of Joe Biden’s mental acuity while in office, accusing Biden’s White House of Lie on journalists and voters.
Fox News’s White House Center, Peter DOOCY, responded by publishing several videos on X showing him that he interrogated Biden and the White House on the then president’s cognitive decline, only to be rejected quickly.
Other White House journalists found it strange that CNN was linked to the book, while some had strong feelings as to whether there was a “coverage”.
A White House journalist really believes that the White House clearly tried to hide the truth of everyone.
“ This was a coverage for any definition, but a Don Quixotic for the Biden team that had been undertaken, at the end of the day, there is only so much that a white house staff can do to protect the President of the United States from exposure to the press and the public.The coverage had private and public dimensions, ” said digital digital white house journalist.
The journalist said that private dimensions included “secret strategies and decision -making”, while public strategy presented “Brazen Lies”, such as Biden’s video that seemed to be confused that it was confused as “cheap fakes” and “the silence of journalists who pressed the problem.”
The Secretary of the Press, Karine Jean-Pierre, of Dooocy and a good handful of other daring journalists, were locked up to ask themselves about the President’s fitness.
“The topic that was so rude and Frange-y to ask about then ended up being the definitive problem of Biden’s presidency,” the white-home journalist said.
A second white -house journalist echoed the thoughts of “The Daily Show”, Jon Stewart, who exploded CNN on Monday to promote a relentless “book on news that should be said -that was a news ago a year ago.”
“The sources are always more eager to speak after the fact, but it is not a good look than CNN, a heavy heavyweight with a lot of weight to challenge the white house as the decline took place, it hardly scratched the surface of the story that Tapper reports now,” said the second Reporter of the White House in Fox News Digital.
“Late work still deserves half of credit,” they added.
A third journalist in the White House initially believed that Biden, 82, only ages, or maybe he suffered side effects and does not believe that the press is guilty.
“You know, it is one of those things; the boy is old. He speaks like an elderly person, and he is pronouncing as time goes on,” said the third journalist in Biden’s White House.
“ I realized, personally, a dramatic difference between when he took office and the beginning of the second year. I suspected and wondered, if it can be because of Covid and the later effects of Covid. He had it twice, I think … I know it has been reported that a type of brain fog can happen after having had it. I left it. ” “I remember a very different Joe Biden in 2014, 2015. It was a younger decade, so it makes sense.”
The third journalist in the White House “does not get” the idea that journalists should have been able to discover the truth about their health at this time.
“How do you report exactly? If you are a journalist in the White House, you have responsibilities to explain what happened that day. As in any white house, there is usually something that happens every day,” they said, emphasizing that reports on Biden’s mental acuity’s concerns would be an important business story.
“People will not confirm medical things, they are not likely to tell you how private it is … Oa Wilmington, because it makes it look bad,” they said. “Now, Biden’s White House was not leaked. He didn’t, so if you want to go after this story you will spend weeks and you may not get anything. In the meantime you are not doing other things.”
The same journalist in the White House is “bewildered” that Jean-Pierre has been so hot to insist that Biden was suitable for the post.
“ To the extent that she says, “ It’s more energetic than me, “ this is a nonsense, and he probably should not say it. On the other hand, to go out and say, “ Oh, no, he is not really unable to do his job and he would have to give up, “ this is not realistic, ” said the White House journalist, who added that Jean-Pierre and other Biden employees had had their skin.
“I mean, hey, you can’t wait for the cabinet head to say,” This guy can’t do the job, “they said.
The third journalist in the White House is not sure that Biden’s age affected his work performance and believes that many of his shortcomings were simply “politics problems”.
“What would I have done very differently if I was younger? I don’t know,” they said. “Until you can show me that he did bad things because he was not at work at that time, you know, I take it with a grain of salt.”
Margaret Chadbourn covers the White House as a Cheddar correspondent, with a seat in the information room, and is a member of the WHCA. She believes that the whole Biden saga has hurt the confidence in the media because the North -Americans wonder what was missing and why it was lost.
“ Maybe journalists need to do some soul search, perhaps, and the question treated Biden in the way they should have, through the lens, they should ask, asking the questions they should have, taking the facts and joining them, or they should look for more facts, ” said Chadbourn in Fox News Digital.
“Should they have done more research?”, Continued Chadbourn. “I just think there is a whole calendar that the media and journalists have to look, not only Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson writing a book.”
Chadbourn, who has been covering Biden since 2005, said he was always affable and always “gaining life interacting with voters.” But as his legacy is defined, he believes that there is anger between the North -Americans about what people perceive as a “misinformation about their health”.
“Not as a media critic, but as a journalist, political journalist, we must see what we may have lost,” Chadbourn said.
The first journalist in the White House to speak anonymously believes that the truth will come out.
“We will learn more about all this as time goes by: first, in the memories of auxiliaries, where, for money, the piety incidents and the sad details they knew at that time and help to hide; and secondly, through the dissemination of files, while we get our hands in the Memoirs of the White House, the Emails and the Texts that will show the e -mails that will show the day. Coverage, and maybe we answer Fox’s news question, told Fox’s news in Fox’s news, he told Fox’s news in Fox’s news, he told the digital report.
#White #House #journalists #talk #Bidens #mental #decay #deliberately #hidden
Image Source : nypost.com